home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- HOW TO GET THE BEST PERFORMANCE FROM THE
- ST225/WD COMBINATION
-
-
-
- The information contained in the other two files (WD.DOC &
- WDCONFIG.DOC) provides the technical information necessary
- to get a hard disk up and running. I changed some of the
- examples to be specific to the Seagate ST225 20 Meg hard
- disk and the Western Digital Controller, WD1002S-WX2. When
- performing the debug low level format this controller will
- respond with "WX2 Format Revision T.8...", if you get "WX2
- Format Revision 6..." you have an older version and will
- need to get a new EPROM with the T.8 software to maximize
- the performance of the ST225.
-
- My ST225 was slow, and relatively speaking, still is. I
- had the older EEPROM so I could make no set up changes and
- it had a CORE test(ver 2.7) performance index of .744.
- Changing the EEPROM and using two values different from
- the initial factory specs allowed me to get a performance
- index of 1.377, an 89% improvement!! There was only a
- relatively minor increase in seek time from 95.7 ms to
- 84.2 ms (the ST225 is rated at 65ms so mine is still a dog
- in this area), but the data transfer rate improved from
- 28.4 KB/sec to 121.7 KB/sec!
-
- The two areas I modified where the interleave factor from
- the recommended 3 to 4 and the CCB option byte (step rate)
- from 05 to 07. This combination proved to provide the best
- performance after many complete formats were tested. I
- tried interleaves of 3,4 and 5 combined with CCB values of
- 00, 03, 05 and 07. 00 formatted ok but hung up during the
- Core test and 03 and 07 provided the same results. I have
- heard somewhere that Western Digital had recommended the
- 07 combination so it is the one I use.
-
- I normally run my XT Turbo clone at 8MHz and with a
- "buffers=24" in my config.sys file as well as LIGHTNING
- installed for the C drive with a cache size of 128K and it
- is this setup that generated the following numbers from
- the PC MAGAZINE benchmark test, version 4.
-
-
- (512 bytes/512 records) OLD NEW
- Sequential file creation: 11.10 sec 11.20 sec
- " " writing: 14.34 " 9.12 "
- " " reading: 12.25 " 6.92 "
- Random " write: 14.01 " 10.21 "
- " " read: 5.11 " 5.06 "
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- (4K bytes/64 records) OLD NEW
- Sequential file creation: 10.88 sec 5.05 sec
- " " writing: 9.95 " 4.07 "
- " " reading: 12.96 " 5.00 "
- Random " write: 5.22 " 3.02 "
- " " read: 6.87 " 3.35 "
-
-
-
- Reading 1000 random sectors: 167.14 msec 119.79 msec
-
-
-
- 1000 seeks - sequential: 21.31 msec 21.25 msec
- " " - random: 96.83 " 85.79 "
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I hope that this and the other two files are helpful and that
- you are able to get the maximum performance from your system.
-
-
- Neil Erbe
- Tampa, Fl
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-